Sunday, March 17, 2024

Demolition of Rockville home proposed (Photos)


The owners of the home at 115 North Van Buren Street in Rockville would like to demolish it to make room for a new house on the property. They have asked the City of Rockville for a review to determine if the 1961 brick house qualifies for historic designation or not. Their application has been reviewed by City staff, and will be taken up by the Historic District Commission at their next scheduled meeting on Thursday, March 21, 2024 at 7:00 PM. City Preservation Planner Sheila Bashiri has reviewed the house and its history in relation to the criteria for preservation, and has determined that the home does not merit historic designation.


115 North Van Buren Street is actually a quite nice home. Its construction is all-brick and solid. It has some small architectural details that modestly aspire toward a mansion. There's even a full tennis court in the backyard! 


All of the fine details are less surprising when you learn that the home was built for the son of the prominent Judge Charles W. Woodward. Judge Woodward was first appointed to the bench by - arguably - Maryland's greatest and most-famous governor, Albert Ritchie, in 1932. 

Four years later, Judge Woodward and his wife Clarice moved into a new home at 111 North Van Buren Street. During the 1950s, the Woodwards purchased adjacent lots. In 1960, the Woodwards' son Arthur and his wife Elizabeth bought the lot at 115 North Van Buren from them. Their home, complete with a one-story office for Dr. Arthur Woodward's medical practice, was built the next year.


Dr. Woodward passed away in 2006. Elizabeth Woodward continued to live in the home until her recent death in 2021. The current owners acquired the property from her estate in 2022, and a family member of theirs has been living in the house since. Now, as residents of Rockville for over 25 years, they would like to build a new "forever home" in its place.

Many people might look at the pictures and say that, with a little fixing up, this would be a wonderful place to live. However, the owners note that the home's interior and basic systems are in poor condition, although livable for the present. There is a significant amount of termite damage. One of the bedrooms has a floor that is structurally unsound. And the medical office, which the owners say appears to not have been used for a very long time, is an unusable space.

Also in the owners' favor, they have gathered a great deal of community support against historic designation of the property from other longtime Rockville residents. Letters representing 17 residents have been submitted with their application, all opposing historic designation. 

Any resident will have the option to voice their opinion on the application during the HDC meeting, by submitting their name and email address to the Historic District Commission, (by email at history@rockvillemd.gov) no later than 9:00 AM on the day of the hearing (March 21, 2024) to be placed on the testimony list. Written testimony can be submitted to the same email address by 4:00 PM on March 20, the day before the meeting.

Photos courtesy City of Rockville

5 comments:

  1. Most of the resident support is directly in response to the City's attempt to force "design guidelines" on the West End, an effort that was successfully killed by local residents. Apparently quite a beautiful house is planned for this lot. The same owners just combined 3 lots to build the house on instead of building 3 pack and stack houses on arguably the best lot in the City. Good luck to them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The City really needs to change its procedure for demolitions. This house isn't in the historic district and was built in 1961. Even if the house was built in 2024 and was proposed to be demolished it would have to go before the Historic Commission. Seems like a waste of resources and holds up the development timeline.

    Most wealthy people move to Potomac after their starter homes - seems like the new owners really must love Rockville to want to deal with the City and all its barriers to building.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your comment is factually inaccurate. Check yourself before posting.

      Delete
  3. Ritchie? Not Spiro Agnew?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I hope the owners will consider using an architectural salvage non-profit before demolition, such as Second Chance in Baltimore. The interior photos published when the house was for sale show quite a bit of unique woodwork, such as rounded passageway trim and a palladian window.

    ReplyDelete