Thursday, February 13, 2025

69% of Montgomery County voters oppose bag tax hike - but County Council passed it anyway


Over two-thirds of registered voters in Montgomery County oppose raising the bag tax to ten cents, a Washington Post/University of Maryland poll found, but the Montgomery County Council unanimously passed it anyway on Tuesday. The poll found that 69% of voters oppose the tax increase on paper bags, and that a minority 47% of voters support the plastic bag ban that was passed alongside it Tuesday. But, as the Council has done increasingly since defeating the Columbia Country Club with its 2009 Purple Line vote that brought no electoral consequences, the Council put its legislative steamroller in gear and floored the accelerator.

Interestingly, the Post declined to print the results of its bag tax/ban poll questions until the day after the Council voted, despite having taken the poll in late January, a clear attempt to tamp down opposition ahead of the Council vote. Tuesday's vote spoke deafening volumes about the deepening radical political trends in Montgomery County, trends that suggest the moribund jurisdiction is on-track for further and accelerating economic decline in the years ahead.

Montgomery County has acquired an international reputation as an anti-business jurisdiction. Not surprisingly, it has failed to attract a major corporate headquarters in over 25 years. Since the last decade, it ranks at or near the bottom by every relevant measure in economic development and job creation in the D.C. region, based on data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. It has long ago fallen out of the Forbes Top Ten Richest Counties in America list, as the wealthy flee to lower-tax jurisdictions in the region. In 2010, stores like Target and Magruder's in Rockville turned their interior lights down, posting apologetic signs explaining it was due to the County's new Energy Tax.

Tuesday's decision won't change the world's perception of us.

According to Wednesday's Post article, Councilmember Marilyn Balcombe (D - District 2) demanded Tuesday that the County begin to go after businesses "more aggressively" if they don't comply with the new ban and tax collection, despite the even-more-complicated regime of mandates imposed by the new law.

Okay, the Council is going to hound your business "more aggressively." But if you're thinking of starting a business, or moving it to Montgomery County, surely you can trust that the local Chamber of Commerce will have your back against the tinfoil dictators of the County Council, right?

Wrong.

The Montgomery County Chamber of Commerce supported the Council's vote. Yes, you read that right. "We worry about Montgomery County being in a position that it's not competitive with surrounding jurisdictions [and] that's not what this bill does," Chamber spokesperson Brian Levine told the Post. 

That's nice, but it's actually false, as Washington, D.C., Arlington County, and Fairfax County do not have bans on plastic bags, and only charge 5 cents per bag, not 10 cents. So putting us in a position that's "not competitive with surrounding jurisdictions" is exactly "what this bill does."

Imagine paying dues to a Chamber that kneecaps you in order to keep political favor with the County Council when the rubber meets the road. This isn't the first time. How many Chamber members wanted this bag law to pass? The Chamber's written testimony goes so far as to declare the organization "applauds the sponsor and co-sponsor for proposing this commonsense policy change." Applauds?! Such kowtowing to an rabidly-anti-business Council is embarrassing for a business organization. Yet again, we cede competitive economic growth territory to Northern Virginia and D.C.

It's bad enough that this is yet another tax hike, at a time when a majority of Montgomery County taxpayers are struggling with already-outrageous grocery prices, and Maryland is about to raise taxes and fees at the state level. But it's also another example of our megalomaniacal elected officials, who have a psychological need to control other people. Council President Kate Stewart (D - District 4) said the new bag law will "change behavior." Voters didn't elect you to "change behavior." They elected you to execute the basic functions of government in a competent manner, foster a favorable climate for business, provide necessary infrastructure and a functioning transportation system, and enforce the laws to protect the safety of the public - - all things this Council hasn't been able to do in this century. 

11 comments:

  1. Their ultimate goal is to vote the county into extinction.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It’s all part of their “plan”

      Delete
  2. It is about time! Bring your own bag!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Totally agree!! We're leaving Montgomery County as soon as we can. Our county leaders obviously are out of touch with middle income voters, and don't care enough to even try to keep us here.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The Council here is really an intellectual play yard for leftists now, similar to Bezerkely, CA. Sad things is that in places like this, moral, financial and venture capital flees and never returns. I think it may behoove some residents to contact their state legislators and at least explore any options in getting the Council neutralized. It would be a great project for the Trump administration lawyers to take on; especially after these folks push the limits on immigration enforcement and find themselves in huge legal jeopardy. Its coming !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 4:04: Absolutely. An FBI investigation of the County Council and Planning Department are also long overdue. I truly believe that a large number of our "representatives" on the Council and in Annapolis would be in prison if we had true federal oversight. Mysteriously, the feds seem obsessed with D.C. and Prince George's County to our exclusion.

      Delete
    2. FBI is filled with ultra woke people who have lost touch not only with their mission, but with reality itself. Sad to see this happen to our most important organizations and agencies.

      Delete
    3. According to Special Counsel John Durhams report,the Crossfire Hurricane investigation should never have been launched, and the FBI "failed to uphold their important mission of strict fidelity to the law in connection with certain events and activities described in this report " maybe ask Kash Patel about this?

      Delete