Tuesday, June 20, 2017

Rockville becomes a sanctuary city

Rockville did last night what the Montgomery County Council and Maryland legislature didn't have the guts to do earlier this year - declare itself a sanctuary city for illegal immigrants. Thumbing their noses at the U.S. Justice Department, and potentially losing millions of dollars in future federal funds, three City Council members voted to pass the Orwellian-sounding "Fostering Community Trust" ordinance. Dissenting were Mayor Bridget Donnell Newton and Councilmember Beryl Feinberg.

The ordinance will codify the informal sanctuary policy the City Police department currently operates under. It passes after the toxic Rockville High School rape case, the theft of a Rockville police officer's assault rifle by an illegal immigrant, and the alleged murderer of a Muslim teenager in Sterling was just revealed to be an illegal immigrant from El Salvador.

During discussion of the ordinance after two hours of public testimony, Feinberg made an alternative motion to direct the City Manager and Police Chief to devise a written policy on how they would deal with immigration status, within 30 days. Councilmember Virginia Onley opposed the motion, but seconded it for the sake of discussion. Councilmember Mark Pierzchala declared Feinberg's proposal as being too late.

Feinberg countered that "we never had a robust discussion," requiring her to make a last-minute proposal to "force the discussion." She said a written policy would be more "nimble" than a formal ordinance, which could not be suspended during an emergency by the City Manager. Feinberg also termed the ordinance, which would forbid any City employee from inquiring about a person's citizenship status, "unenforceable."

Speakers backing sanctuary status for Rockville hurled invective at opponents throughout the Community Forum segment of the meeting: "racist, xenophobia, hate, anti-immigrant (as opposed to anti-illegal immigrant), genocide, hate-filled time." But Feinberg and Newton questioned that holier-than-thou attitude. "Both sides have been fearmongering," Feinberg said. Newton decried the "venom spread by both sides" in the months-long debate.

Newton said she was "disappointed" that the same councilmembers who only recently released the text of the ordinance would now block another member from proposing a last-minute alternative. She called the ordinance "a solution in search of a problem," noting that Rockville has had no issues with its current police policy. Newton suggested such policy is better written by police, than by politicians with political motives.

"That was just a staggering speech," Pierzchala said. "Thank you," replied Newton sarcastically. "And not in the good sense," Pierzchala clarified.

"This is how this body has been functioning for more than a year now," Feinberg said. "Things will be just shoved in front of us." She bemoaned the "collegiality" among her colleagues. Onley expressed agreement with Feinberg's assessment, even though she did not support Feinberg's proposal. Onley said, "we need work sessions, not surprise attacks and last-minute motions."

When the Mayor called the vote, the Team Rockville slate of Pierzchala, Onley and the sponsor of the ordinance, Julie Palakovich Carr, voted in favor, and Newton and Feinberg voted against it.

There were some intriguing aspects to the discussion prior to the vote.

Proponents of sanctuary status, caught off-guard by the strong opposition by legal Asian immigrants at a March public hearing on the proposal, had claimed many of those speakers were not Rockville residents. But last night, they bused in sanctuary advocates from Bethesda, Silver Spring, Takoma Park, Gaithersburg and Washington, D.C. to testify in favor of the ordinance, doing exactly what they had accused opponents of three months ago.

Second, during the Mayor and Council discussion, Palakovich Carr stated that cities that don't enforce federal immigration law have lower crime rates. That is simply not true. In Frederick, which does enforce federal immigration law, you have a 1 in 196 chance of being the victim of a violent crime such as murder, rape, armed robbery, or assault. In Baltimore, a sanctuary city, your chance of being a victim shoots up to 1 in 65. In Chicago, where Mayor Rahm Emanuel has presided over a sanctuary city and record numbers of homicides, it is 1 in 110. In sanctuary San Francisco, it is 1 in 127.

Frederick is clearly safer. In Manassas, after Prince William County Chairman Corey Stewart's policy to enforce federal immigration law passed ten years ago, today your chance of being a victim of a violent crime is a staggeringly low 1 in 454. Aggravated assaults in Prince William County have dropped by 27% since then, and not a single racial profiling complaint has been filed with the County police. Police there can only inquire about citizenship status after arresting a suspect and taking him or her to the County jail.

As speaker Liz Matory noted in her testimony during the Community Forum, the research done for the Mayor and Council by staff regarding the proposed ordinance did not take into consideration the policy of Frederick County.

28 comments:

  1. And they wonder how Trump won.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Via an archaic electoral system despite losing by millions of votes?

      Delete
  2. Rockville's Council and Mayor, by thumbing their noses at the Justice Department and the President, have acted stupidly and not in the best interests of Rockville residents. Why would they choose to "poke the bear?" Will Rockville now get in legal pissing matches with Jeff Sessions, costing local residents millions of dollars? I agree with having an informal policy, but codifying it into law is blatantly political in motivation and strategically stupid. This is not in the best interests of our community.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Simple question - why prioritize illegals sanctuary over citizens safety? Yes, these are not unrelated. We know why - vote bank politics. Shameless politicians will sell out the country for an easy vote. They know they already have legal residents votes in the bag, now it's time to pander to the next potential voting bloc.

    Let's be clear, Trump is only proposing to enforce the law. Nothing more. This is not unreasonable nor are immigration requirements frivolous. Do we not enforce other laws?

    Complacency is a very dangerous thing to civilization. Just ask the Romans...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Fostering community trust...they just lost mine

    ReplyDelete
  5. Comparing suburban farm Frederick to the most violent urban cities in the U.S., Baltimore and Chicago. You don't have to be a laywer to see the faulty comparison.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The city of Frederick is not a suburban farm, but your point is noted.

      Delete
    2. 12:52: It's not a faulty comparison. They have violence in part because they are sanctuary cities.

      Delete
    3. Rob, it's disingenuous to compare the murder rate of a city of 70 thousand (Frederick) to the murder rate of a city of 2 million (Chicago)

      Delete
    4. 5:08: I disagree. If I were simply comparing the number of crimes in Frederick versus the number in Chicago, you'd be correct. But the statistic I've used is your chance of being the victim of a violent crime, for which the total size of the population is irrelevant. Thus we can compare the job each city is doing in protecting its citizens, while also measuring the impact of being a sanctuary city on the violent crime rate.

      Delete
  6. i wish them the best! coming soon to a rockville neighborhood near you...

    ReplyDelete
  7. this is absolutely disgusting. I haven't heard of a single good news from these crown since I moved in to Rockville last year

    ReplyDelete
  8. Lefties are nuts

    ReplyDelete
  9. Is there a fantasy of safety here in the Emerald City? MoCo gov and new big Court Houses..a patina of Teflon? The residents speak of seeing frightening things. Very gingerly and in private.There is much in Rockville that has been tried and found waiting. Not the right time. Waiting was the word I meant to use.BETTER WATCH CLOSELY THE POLLING PLACES AND VOTE COUNTS. YOU HAVE NOT BEFORE. OBVIOUSLY.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Good news. Proud of our city for doing this.
    Progress.

    ReplyDelete
  11. It's easy to champion these ridiculous causes when you're sitting pretty and not a victim of the consequences (actually you indirectly are, you just don't realize it). It's all fun and games until someone gets hurt.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Easy for you to call it ridiculous when you're not part of the immigrant community.

      Delete
  12. This seems to be pissing off Robert and a lot of conservative nuts, so beyond supporting it on merit, I find it even more joy in it passing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kind of like how loony heads are exploding over Trump being in the White House?

      Delete
    2. You find joy in MS-13 executing a 15 year old girl from Montgomery County? Sick! The real "nuts" are the ones inviting an invasion of criminal illegal aliens for personal and political gain.

      Delete
    3. Like my ancestors did you your criminal realtives when they let your kind in?

      Delete
    4. ^^ Can someone translate?

      Delete
    5. I'm not an immigrant. My ancestors were here before the nation was formed.

      Delete
    6. So you've always been an immigrant hater?

      Delete
    7. Where is the hate from me? Is suggesting we should obey federal laws, "hate?"

      Delete
    8. "I'm not an immigrant. My ancestors were here before the nation was formed."

      So how much Native ancestry do you have, Robert?

      Delete
    9. 6:20: I don't know, but what I do know is that my European ancestors were here prior to the country being established. There was no nation state to emigrate to, hence I am not an immigrant. Conquerors. Settlers. But not immigrants.

      Delete