Wednesday, July 8, 2020

Montgomery County criticized for releasing man who allegedly sexually abused child

A man arrested for allegedly sexually abusing a child on June 18 was released from jail by the Montgomery County Department of Corrections on June 23. In the meantime, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) officers had lodged a detainer request for Rene Atilio Ramos-Hernandez, 56.

ICE officials complain that Montgomery County did not honor the detainer request. They say the County called them at moment they were releasing Ramos-Hernandez, and refused to hold him for the time it would take ERO officers to travel to the jail.

“Montgomery County continues the practice of not honoring lawful ICE detainers and release potential public safety threats back into the community,” acting ICE Baltimore Field Office Director Francisco Madrigal said in a statement. “When they refuse to give adequate notification of an impending release to allow a safe transfer of custody, it shows their actions are insincere. ICE believes the best way to protect public safety is for law enforcement to work together.”

Officials in Montgomery County and other jurisdictions that refuse to comply with ICE requests have said detainers are not arrest warrants. They argue that the County could be sued for illegally holding a prisoner after his or her release. ICE reports that Ramos-Hernandez is in the country illegally, and remains at large.


  1. When Biden is President there will be no ICE and no enforcement of these kinds of crimes. No deportation,but only the opening of our borders to let in millions and millions of illegal immigrants. Fun times.

  2. I don't support "detainer" because that's without any legal support. It's like holding someone off the street without any charge.

    But what SHOULD happen is that MoCo provides 24 hours notice of impending release, so that ICE can be there if they want to. That's what Madrigal requested, and that's reasonable.

    1. Peter, how is MCPD going to know 24 hours ahead of time how a judge is going to rule in the prelim? It's not "reasonable" to think they have a crystal ball. Either you illegally detain someone after a judge rules on release/bail, or you don't.