Monday, May 15, 2017

Another MCPS security employee charged with having sex with student

Montgomery County police have arrested and charged a Montgomery County Public Schools employee for allegedly having sex with a 14-year-old student at Col. Brooke E. Lee Middle School in Silver Spring, where he was a "security employee." Mike Anthony Lievano, 21, of University Boulevard in Silver Spring, has been charged with sexual abuse of a minor, a third-degree sex offense, and fourth-degree sex offense.

Police say Lievano turned himself in late last night, and was transported to the Central Processing Unit. He is being held on a $10,000 bond.

Lievano is the second MCPS security employee in a month to be charged with having sex with a minor girl at the school he was assigned to. In the first case, at Richard Montgomery High School, it was revealed that MCPS had failed to do a background check on that employee, who had faced charges in a strip club gun incident easily found through a Google search.

Detectives say Lievano and the girl at Lee MS started "dating" on March 29, after an exchange of text messages. They did not say how the suspect obtained the girl's cell phone number. "Inappropriate sexual contact" took place between the two at his home, and her home.

Police ask anyone who believes that his/her child may have been victimized by Lievano in a similar way to call the Special Victims Investigations Division at 240-773-5400.

14 comments:

  1. MCPS did do a background check. You might want to correct your article.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nope. A gun charge in NYC would definitely have shown up in any credible background check. That they were unaware of it, proves they did not run any kind of legitimate background check. So there's my evidence. What is your evidence that a background check was conducted? A spokesperson claiming they did?

      Delete
    2. For the purposes of a background check, the FCRA does not allow the use of any non-convictions older than seven years. The non-conviction in this case was 13 years old. Therefore, the background check conducted by MCPS would not have reported this information.

      Delete
    3. 8:49: A background check for a security "leader" working closely with minor children wouldn't find a gun charge at a strip club readily found in newspaper articles on Google? I'd be scared if I was an MCPS parent, I can tell you that right now. That's not a background check.

      Delete
    4. Then your beef is with the Fair Credit Reporting Act, not the background check. Call your congress member. Or are you suggesting that MCPS should disobey the law when making employment decisions?

      Delete
    5. 1:09: Wait, they have to obey the FCRA but not detainers from ICE? Help me understand this selective compliance with federal law.

      MCPS did put kids at risk by not running a background check.

      Delete
  2. The smile in the photo speaks for itself. Note that the alleged crimes took place after the infamous Rockville High gang rape incident. Clearly the weak stance Montgomery County and MCPS leadership took on that matter has filtered down through the organization, to rank and file employees like this. Rape culture is alive and well in the Montgomery County political cartel.

    ReplyDelete
  3. What is your evidence that they didn't?

    Your opinion and a 2017 google search.
    So, in all truth, you got nuttin honey

    ReplyDelete
  4. 8:20: I've got evidence. What evidence do you have? Zippo.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Why would I need evidence? You're loosing it man.
    You have an opinion.
    They have the actual background check.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 1:14: I think Jack Smith is "loosing it" if he believes they did a background check, and somehow missed a gun charge involving a woman at a strip club for a guy they want to mingle with kids at RMHS.

      Delete
  6. Your "thinking" doesn't change the **fact** it was done.

    No matter how you phrase it, who you insult, how many times you say it, it will never change the FACT that a background check was done. Period.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There's no evidence a background check was ever done. There is evidence NO background check was ever done. Period.

      Delete
    2. Except there IS evidence one was done.
      Your only "evidence" is your opinion.
      Period. You can't wish it away.
      No probs. The court proceeding will prove you wrong. Then what?

      Delete