Wednesday, November 29, 2017

MoCo school board thumbs nose at Rockville parents in Richard Montgomery ES #5 boundary decision

Option B was approved in a split
vote by the school board Monday night
The Montgomery County Board of Education will bus some kids out of their home neighborhoods to the new Richard Montgomery Elementary School #5, after choosing Option B out of five redistricting proposals Monday night. While it was far from the worst of the options to parents' minds, it still will result in longer travel times for a good number of Rockville elementary school students. Those students would have originally attended Beall ES and Ritchie Park ES in their own neighborhoods; now they will be bused to RMES#5.

The board's decision maintains a high number of FARMS students at Twinbrook ES, students who qualify for free and reduced-price meals, meaning they will be able to continue going to their neighborhood elementary school.


  1. The two areas that are currently served by Ritchie Park, that are being shifted to the new school, are much closer to the new school and not separated by a 12-lane freeway as they are now. Not sure what your pearl-clutching is all about.

    1. If it's so great, why are parents in that area complaining about the decision?

    2. Perhaps, but these parents' children also attend a school--Beall--that is overcapacity so it should not surprise them that neighborhoods in the southern end of the Beall service area are assigned to the new school. Let's also remember that the community vigorously advocated for this new school to relieve overcrowding at Beall, College Gardens and Ritchie Park. Alternative A left the new school less than 80 percent occupied, an outcome which would have rightly drawn criticism from taxpayers who are paying tens of millions for this project. Board members chose the best alternative available to them.

      What should concern MoCo residents is that the Board includes a voting student member, occupied this year by Matthew Post, who is not accountable to the taxpaying electorate. He was the only member who spoke favorably of Alternative D that would have resulted in costly and convoluted busing schemes to engineer a student demographic balance that he preferred, but the community overwhelmingly rejected. Thank goodness that members who actually face voters exercised more wisdom and sound judgment. Student members should be advisory only and not have a vote.

  2. So how would you have re-apportioned the school cluster, Mr. Dyer? Apparently you can only make accusations rather than offering solutions.

  3. Thanks for mentioning this. We went to these meetings at the BoE and they selected our second favorite choice (the first being most agreeable for our own interests). The first option (A), supported the most loudly by parents over most of the cluster, while geographically the most contiguous, resulted in still overcrowded schools and a low capacity at the new elementary school. This option still keeps things generally contiguous (to the detriment of some neighbhorhoods) but justified the full buildout of the school. Twinbrook, from what I hear, are happy with staying at their school, as a redistibution of students could result in a loss of federal funds and of course there are transportation challenges for lower-income families.