Tuesday, March 5, 2019

Fallsgrove Sunday Safeway bank robber strikes again - and gets away again

Encore! Encore!
The same suspect returned to the scene of his alleged past crimes this past Sunday at the Fallsgrove Safeway at 14939 Shady Grove Road. As he has done each month so far this year, he passed a note to the teller at the in-store SunTrust Bank, obtained cash, and fled. He even came around the exact same time as he did last month. What's astonishing is that no one was prepared for him by now, and that some of the basic anti-robbery strategies appear to not be employed by SunTrust.

No exploding dye pack? No marked bills? Or other similar tactics to lead police to the perpetrator after a getaway? You would think the bank would be expecting the guy at this point, and that police would be staking out the bank on Sundays.

Instead, we have another photo of the suspect pulling off his latest alleged heist. It's no wonder he's often shown on his phone while at the store. "I can't believe how easy it is to rob a bank in Montgomery County - thank God for our soft-on-crime County Council," he must be saying to disbelieving friends. It's SunTrust customers in Rockville and elsewhere who have to pay ever-higher banking fees to make up for the cash that people like this guy get away with.

Anyone with information about the suspect or these bank robberies is asked to contact the Montgomery County Department of Police – Major Crimes Division at 240-773-5100. To be eligible for a reward, tipsters may call Crime Solvers of Montgomery County toll-free at 1-866-411-TIPS (8477). Crime Solvers will pay a cash reward of up to $10,000 for information provided to them that leads to the arrest and/or indictment of this suspect. Tipsters may remain anonymous.

42 comments:

  1. Wakanda forever!

    ReplyDelete
  2. No anvil fell on his head. No cigar exploded in his mouth. This is Hans' fault, clearly.

    ReplyDelete
  3. So Mr. Dyer what the HELL do you think the "Council" should do to prevent this? You and your almighty, KIA brain have any bright ideas to legislate this crime away? The world of geniuses is waiting......

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 11:10: First of all, replace their pro-criminal policy with a tough-on-crime policy. That includes more officers, a new gang unit, and a helicopter. In this particular case, maybe, you know, have a couple of officers staking out the SunTrust mid-afternoon on Sundays? Captain Obvious shouldn't be that hard to predict.

      What is a "KIA brain?"

      Much like MCPS, the tone is set at the top. When the Council facilitates $7 million embezzlement schemes, allows gangs to operate open drug markets and human trafficking rings and collect protection money from businesses, while throwing gang rape victims under the bus, they send a clear message to criminals that they are welcome here.

      Delete
    2. You sound like a crazy person, Dyer. Hate on MCPD all you want, but they're not going to post an officer here all day just to save SunTrust a small amount of cash. SunTrust will hire a security guard if they feel loss prevention needs to be a higher priority.

      Delete
    3. 8:08: I'm the top supporter of MCPD in the County. You're thinking of our cop-hating County Council, who in this term alone have falsely accused MCPD officers of racial profiling.

      Meanwhile, I'm the guy who came out in 10 degree weather to save health benefits for police officers, and was the only journalist to report that an officer was almost struck when a driver intentionally tried to run him down while rolling out spike strips during a pursuit - which highlighted the Council's ongoing failure to provide officers with a helicopter. They had been calling for the state chopper to join the pursuit long before that officer was nearly killed.

      Meanwhile, yeah, I would probably post an officer there midafternoon on Sundays. The guy is just trolling at this point, and you have to nip it in the bud.

      Delete
    4. KIA - know-it-all.
      Most of your solutions are the same campaign crap you hear from all wannabe politicians and no real answers. "Tough?" Helicopters? A stakeout is a waste of time for a bank which obviously has issues with protection. AND, this could be an inside job!

      Delete
    5. "I'm the guy who came out in 10 degree weather to save health benefits for police officers"

      You can't even keep your own talking points straight. The issue was over tightening requirements for disability pensions, not "health benefits".

      Also, no one gets brownie points for "going out in 10 degree weather" - in your case, going from your heated house, to your heated car, to the heated auditorium, with only brief intervals outside. Many people spend their entire workday outside under much worse conditions.

      Delete
    6. @ 10:42 AM - I read that as "Killed-In-Action Brain". Which makes perfect sense. LOL

      Delete
  4. How are you going to pay for all? What services will you cut to pay for more officers and a helicopter? You also have promised to improve the schools.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 8:36: We're overspending on MCPS with terrible results. I don't need to spend more; we need to change the curriculum, the leadership, and improve safety and security for students.

      There's plenty to cut in the budget to pay for a helicopter.

      Delete
    2. Change the curriculum from what to what? Are you knowledgeable on education? Have a child in MCPS? Teach in MCPS? Have an education degree?

      Do your homework first. Provide a school by school breakdown of spending, class size, graduation rates, curriculum, safety and security. Do all that and then come back and tell us how to spend the money.

      Delete
  5. What good would posting an officer do? The guy would just move to another bank.

    Unless you plan to have a cop at every bank and ATM you can’t eliminate all stick ups.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dude, the guy keeps hitting that same bank.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. I think you are the bank robber bro.

      Delete
    4. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    5. Nope. Is it you?

      Robert are you willing to stake out the Safeway to catch the robber guy?

      Delete
    6. Dude! Everybody in Rockville reads your FABULOUS blog and I bet that includes the robber. Now that he knows you are on to him, he might change up his game.

      So thanks for nothing DUDE.

      Delete
    7. Zip-a-dee-doo-dah, zip-a-dee-ay

      Delete
  6. Yes,that is pretty incompetent of everyone involved in the investigation and security of the bank because the same person has robbed it 3 times.Maybe an inside job?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 11:29: Can't rule it out. The amount of money really starts adding up with 3 robberies.

      Delete
  7. Nothing but a bunch of pathetic commenting from a perpetual loser candidate for any office you can find. You can't distinguish soft on crime from soft on Charmin. Give your readers an example of what jurisdiction in your bird-brain is tough on crime, and what the "moribund" government you so hate, can do to prevent these occurrences.

    And the internal employee embezzlement scam you so love to repeatedly regurgitate, happens globally, until the perps are caught by the system. I can tell you of reading about the city of Rockville nearly fifty year ago getting stung by their finance director, DC was stung for $48 mil in 2007 by a property tax manager who spent lavishly at Neiman-Marcus til she was caught. I could go on an on, but you are deaf and dumb to reality dude. SHIT HAPPENS! MoCo officials caught it and your crIitcism SUCKS!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 10:32: More lies. MoCo officials did NOT "catch" the supposed lone embezzler - the IRS did, and then contacted the County, who covered it up for more than a year until the election was safely over.

      This MoCo embezzlement case is unique, given what a free hand was given to Mr. Bang. Based on the public comments of some of the County officials who had oversight over Bang, they are either complete morons who allowed millions to go out without approval, or are in on the scheme themselves. Bang's light sentence suggests he may have been a fall guy for higher-ups. "You got us caught by the IRS, so it's your fault. You're now going to jail regardless. Let's make a deal: You say it was you and your gambling addiction, and we'll give you a lighter sentence and you won't have to report to prison until a later date."

      Alas - LOL - the judge in the second sentencing turned out to be a slight touch tougher than they expected, ordering him to begin serving his sentence before his 1000 appeals are heard. That's what you get for trusting the MoCo cartel!

      It's very easy to distinguish soft-on-crime: You just load up the pictures of the Montgomery County Council. Their solution to the gang crisis? Midnight basketball. LOL

      I'm only a loser candidate because A) the press such as the Post are colluding with the cartel, and won't allow my campaign any exposure, and B) voter fraud and voting result manipulation, as clearly seen in the anomalous voting results at many precincts across the County.

      Delete
    2. "It's very easy to distinguish soft-on-crime: You just load up the pictures of the Montgomery County Council."

      In other words, you can't back up your claim that the Council is "soft on crime". You just jump to childish insults. Very unprofessional.

      "The anomalous voting results at many precincts across the County."

      In other words, the overwhelming majority of County residents very understandably not voting for Robert Dyer, apart from those idiots who vote for any loser with an "(R)" next to his name.

      Delete
    3. "the judge in the second sentencing turned out to be a slight touch tougher than they expected, ordering him to begin serving his sentence before his 1000 appeals are heard. That's what you get for trusting the MoCo cartel!"

      More likely there was no such deal between Bang and "the MoCo Cartel". Especially since the latter doesn't actually exist.

      Delete
    4. 5:13: Is English your first language? A poor finish across the board is not what happened. What did happen was anomalous results at many polling places.

      The violent crime statistics alone prove the Council is soft-on-crime, and those statistics came for the MCPD themselves. Murder up 31%, rape up 53%, gang violence up 72%. Damn. You just got served.

      9:38: The existence of the criminal MoCo cartel is beyond question.

      Delete
  8. Why is it losers always screech voter fraud? Why can't a loser just accept the fact the LOST? Republicans and Democrats both.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 2:36: There's a difference between mere screeching, and having stacks of data from polling places, and proof that the Post didn't print a single sentence about the general election Council At-Large campaign. Collusion and voter fraud.

      Delete
    2. Yea voter fraud. Didn’t they bus in hundreds of undocumented from D.C? You definitely would have one if the millions of people didn’t cheat

      Delete
    3. 4:32: I don't think they're lacking in undocumented in MoCo, so you do have a lot of people voting illegally using the names of deceased or moved-away voters.

      Delete
    4. How do you make the jump from "there are undocumented immigrants in Montgomery County" to "they all voted illegally using the names of deceased or moved-away voters, for candidates other than me"?

      Delete
    5. 8:53: Because that's the way they vote illegally, except when they illegally register under one of the fake driver's license mills operating in the county. One was shut down around the election time, ironically, but they conveniently did not seize the illegal licenses to prevent those illegals from using them to register and vote.

      The anomalies in voting results are in my results, so it's clear I was targeted with the voter fraud, likely because I was the only person running with name recognition besides Robin Ficker and Marc Elrich.

      Delete
  9. What did happen was anomalous results at many polling places...having stacks of data from polling places...voter fraud"

    Four months later and you've still got nothing. People didn't vote for you because you were a poor candidate.

    "the Post didn't print a single sentence about the general election Council At-Large campaign"

    What campaign? You didn't campaign anywhere outside of your own blogs, and the other three Republicans didn't campaign at all. None of you had collected any campaign funds. Why should the Post do the work that you are too lazy to do? Also, I note that you instructed voters not to vote for any of the three other Republicans in a video posted on your blog.

    "The existence of the criminal MoCo cartel is beyond question."

    It exists only in your deranged mind. Literally no one else believes this nonsense.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 9:48: LOL - What a load of malarkey coming from the least-talented tool in Montgomery County.

      The anomalous results at specific polling places are verifiable fact. No way to sweep that under the rug.

      My campaign was on every social media platform, had video ads, went door-to-door and in all of the parades I was allowed into, and had more signs countywide than any of the Democrats running against me.

      The "work" you're talking about is the Post's job, to inform the voting public about the people on the ballot, and in my case also about my activism and engagement on the issues. Jennifer Barrios was the Post reporter "too lazy" to "do the work."

      Good Lord - you have zero credibility claiming there is no Montgomery County cartel. They almost elected David Blair in the primary (and that was even with the executive primary having splintered the cartel in half), and elected every one of their Council candidates. Denying the existence of the cartel that writes your paychecks and covers the cost of your apartment is a clown move, bro.

      Delete
    2. "I had more signs countywide than any of the Democrats running against me."

      Wow, your lies are getting bolder and bolder with each passing day. You didn't have ANY signs.

      Delete
    3. 9:50: You just told the biggest lie of all. I not only had yard signs, but there were more of them on lawns and in businesses than my opponents had.

      I did not place illegal signs in public right-of-ways, but my opponents had so few signs, they didn't either. Sad!

      Delete
    4. 9:00: You can't prove a negative - the burden is on you to produce photos of my opponents' signs (Hint: You can't, because they were so sure they would win - almost as if they had advance knowledge of the results...not that that would be possible, right?)

      I'm smarter than those dolts in the cubicles around you right now. Better pick up Hans' dry cleaning.

      Delete
    5. What on earth are you talking about? Get Hans's dry cleaning? Why do you automatically think I support Hans? I don't. All I asked was asking was for proof you had more signs up because I remember seeing none. Everybody else flooded my mailbox with those annoying and pointless advertising cards. Didn't see any from you.

      I'm not asking to "prove a negative" I'm asking how you knew you had more signs. Besides counting sings isn't a good way to predict the out come and is pretty meaningless. I have no need to tell the world who I support (an NO dude not Hans).

      Delete
  10. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete